State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona seeks relief from the respondent judge’s orders compelling depositions in the underlying civil forfeiture proceeding by the real parties in interest, defendants in both the forfeiture action and a parallel criminal proceeding, of named victims in the criminal proceeding. At issue is the scope of a victim’s right to refuse a pre-trial deposition under Arizona’s Victims’ Bill of Rights (VBR), article II, § 2.1 of the Arizona Constitution. The question we must answer is whether the VBR guarantees victims the right…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winterbottom v. RonanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re BOND FORFEITURE IN COCHISE COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. WeltyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Burns v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Forde v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.