Reynolds v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Opinion by

Judge SILVERSTEIN * .

Charles Edward Reynolds, claimant, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) finding that claimant had reached maximum medical improvement, that vocational rehabilitation benefits should be terminated, and that claimant was not entitled to medical benefits for a replacement prosthesis. We affirm in part, set aside in part, and remand with directions.

Claimant sustained an industrial injury to his right foot in December 1985, which resulted in amputation of the lower leg and foot. His employer, respondent Dual Drilling and its…