Legal Opinion
Claims of the Dependents of Nunnally v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1996No. 96CA0509PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In the workers’ compensation proceeding, claimants, who are the surviving dependents of the deceased employee, Anthony B. Nun-nally (Nunnally), petition for review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel denying their claim for permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits. We affirm.
Nunnally suffered an admitted industrial injury during his employment with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Following his injury, Nunnally committed suicide. Although his authorized treating physician had not determined that Nunnally had reached maximum medical improvement (MMI)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Golden Animal Hospital v. HortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Story v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Estate of Huey Ex Rel. Huey v. J.C. Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Reynolds v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- McKinley v. Bronco Billy'sColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Loveland Police Department v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Singleton v. Kenya Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Magnetic Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- MAGNETIC ENGINEERING, INC., and State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE of Colorado and Michael MarshallColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- MAGNETIC ENGINEERING, INC., and State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE of Colorado and Michael MarshallColorado Court of Appeals · 2000