Legal Opinion

Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 17, 1994No. 93SC497, 93SC655PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira

The question presented in these consolidated workers’ compensation cases is whether the Workers’ Compensation Act of Colorado, sections 8-42-101 to 8-47-209, 3B C.R.S. (1994 Supp.) (the Act) violates equal protec tion of the laws under the federal and state constitutions by establishing two different methods for calculating an award of benefits: one based on a rating schedule applicable to injuries resulting in the partial loss or loss of use of extremities (hands, arms, feet and legs) and the other based on a medical impairment rating applicable to injuries resulting in the total loss or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. COLORADO AFL-CIO v. DonlonColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In Re the Adoption of T.K.J.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API