Legal Opinion

Anaya v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 16, 1973No. 26006PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

The respondent Noffsinger is a farmer, and one of his crops is potatoes. In addition to potato cellars located on his farm, he has leased a cellar located on other property which he uses when his own cellars are full. After his potatoes have been dug, they are brought to a cellar, sorted and stored, awaiting sale. Only his potatoes reach these cellars. The petitioner (claimant) was employed by Noffsinger to sort potatoes and, while doing so, was injured. The Industrial Commission denied the claimant any award by reason of the statute, C.R.S. 1963, 81-2-6(4), which exempts “employers of . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romero v. HodgsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  2. Kinterknecht v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Billings Ditch Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Otto v. HahnNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Roberts v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Higgs v. Western Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Matthews v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API