Legal Opinion

Barrington v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1927No. Docket No. 5198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This appeal is from a judgment on the verdict of the jury in favor of respondents in an action for personal injuries suffered by appellant in a collision between an automobile driven by appellant and an interurban car of respondent corporation.

Appellant specifies six assignments of error which he urges as grounds for a reversal of the judgment. The first four have to do with the giving and refusing of certain instructions. The fifth assignment of error is that the court erred in not requiring the defendant Sharpe, when upon the witness-stand, to produce his written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Churchill v. MoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Goldman v. DahlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Podesta v. DelucchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API