Legal Opinion

Mosko Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1962No. Appeals, Nos. 90 and 91PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In these unemployment compensation cases the Board of Employment Security, the Referee and the *74Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all concluded that the claimants were disqualified for benefits in that their unemployment was due to an industrial dispute under the provisions of §402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (d).

Michael J. Mosko and Element E. Segina, the claimants, were last employed at the Duquesne Works of the United States Steel Corporation, in the electric furnace department, on July 4, 1959. They were members of United Steelworkers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oluschak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Bako Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Climax Fire Brick Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Stringent v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Jones & Langhlin Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. General Motors Corp. Unemployment Compensation CasesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Stewart v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API