Legal Opinion

Bako Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This is an appeal by 624 claimants from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, wherein the employer, Bethlehem Steel Company, was permitted to intervene as an appellee. The claims of some appellants were dismissed because they had not filed timely appeals from the initial determinations of the Bureau, the Board holding, under the evidence,.that the claimants were not misled by statements of the compensation authorities. The claims of others were denied because the claimants were disqualified for benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Law, §402(d),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. American Steel Foundries v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Saunders v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pickman v. WeltmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Hamilton Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Department of Industrial Relations v. SavageAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Department of Industrial Relations v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API