Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. Unemployment Compensation Cases

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 92, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137 and 138 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

These are appeals from decisions and orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review reversing a referee’s allowance of appellants’ claims for compensation.

The claimant-appellants, members of Local 544, United Auto Workers, are employed by the Fisher Body Division of General Motors Corporation at a stamping plant (hereinafter, the “Pittsburgh plant”) located in West Mifflin, near McKeesport, Pennsylvania. The function of this stamping plant, is to produce component sheet metal parts of automobile bodies preparatory to shipment by rail to various…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bako Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. C. A. Wright Plumbing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Climax Fire Brick Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Mosko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Fort Pitt Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Paoloco v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Trella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Moltrup Steel Products Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API