Murphy v. Housel & Housel
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The only issue to be resolved in this ease is whether the trial court ruled correctly when it granted a summary judgment to Housel & Housel, Jerry W. Housel and John 0. Housel (the Housels), on the premise that the statute of limitations for attorney malpractice had run at the time the action was filed. In ruling against Delphine Badura Murphy and Elmarie Denney, the successor co-personal representatives of the Estate of Dominie G. Badura (the personal representative), the trial court concluded that there was no genuine issue of fact as to when a successor attorney became…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Mills v. GarlowWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Adelizzi v. StrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Ballinger v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.