Legal Opinion

F.A.S. International, Inc. v. Reilly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 29, 1980PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff F.A.S. International, Inc., hereinafter F.A.S., is a New York corporation authorized to do business in Connecticut. During the period relevant to this case it had three correspondence school divisions, Famous Artists School, Famous Writers School and Famous Photographers School, each of which used practicing professional artists, writers and photographers, respectively, to analyze and critique students’ correspondence lessons.

The finding of the court is not subject to attack with one exception and that correction is made by an addition from the draft finding. Some findings of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Darling v. Burrone Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Alexander v. R. A. Sherman's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Rozran v. DurkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tianti v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Pagani v. BT II, Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborConnecticut Superior Court · 1992
  5. State, Department of Labor v. Medical Placement Services, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API