Legal Opinion

Steel v. Wheeler

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided June 8, 1999No. 12-97-00364-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM WORTHEN, Justice.

In this property dispute, Cody Wheeler (‘Wheeler”) claimed the right to use a road bordered by Bryan, Bobby and Ruby Steel’s (“the Steels”) land under an implied dedication for public use. After a jury trial, the court granted Wheeler judgment for an implied dedication of the roadway in question and $14,800.00 in attorneys’ fees. The Steels have appealed and raised four issues for our review. We will affirm.

Wheeler purchased a 192-acre tract of land in 1993. His only access to his land was via a strip of land known as the Upper Centraba Road. 1 The Steels owned two tracts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Triplex Communications, Inc. v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Reinhart v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lindner v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barstow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Supak v. Zboril, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Securtec, Inc. v. County of Gregg, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Rutledge v. Staner, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
  4. City of Austin v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. Reed v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API