Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Garza

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided December 18, 2003No. 03-03-00307-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

This case concerns the development of commercial property over the Barton Creek Watershed. Eli Garza applied for and was granted the right to develop property in what was once known as the Garza Ranch in the Barton Creek Watershed. The City of Austin (“City”) subsequently refused to allow development to proceed under the terms set out in the final and approved subdivision plat. The City disputed the validity of one of the notes contained in the plat, which would have allowed up to seventy percent impervious cover under certain circumstances. Garza sought and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of White Settlement v. Super Wash, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. TRUDY'S TEXAS STAR, INC. v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Hawkins v. El Paso First Health Plans, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Weatherford v. City of San Marcos, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. City of El Paso, Texas v. High Ridge Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API