Legal Opinion
Dillingham Construction N.A., Inc. v. County of Sonoma
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 11, 1991No. C 90-1272 FMSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS
FERN M. SMITH, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
At issue in this case is the State of California’s authority to establish and enforce minimum employment standards for apprentices. The State of California (the “State”) requires that public works .contractors who employ apprentices employ only those apprentices who participate in apprenticeship programs with state-approved standards. Defendants in this case include two state agencies which enforce apprenticeship standards; the head of each of those agencies; and the County of Sonoma. All defendants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Southern California Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractor Inc. v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Dillingham Construction N.A. v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Saginaw Valley Area Chapter v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Dillingham Construction v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.