Legal Opinion
Dillingham Construction N.A. v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1999No. 92-15247PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
I. BACKGROUND
This case has raised the issue of whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) preempts the application of a state prevailing wage law that requires the payment of prevailing wages to employees in apprenticeship programs that have not received state approval but allows the payment of lower apprenticeship wages to employees participating in state approved apprenticeship programs. The district court held that neither ERISA nor the NLRA preempts the apprentice prevailing wage law. See Dillingham…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tocher v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- American Hotel & Lodging Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Calop Business Systems, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Dillingham Construction v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.