Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Pittman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1935No. 2233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

The trustees of the estate of Bernice P. Bishop, deceased, brought their bill in equity in tile court below seeking instructions in reference to the distribution of the sum of $17,194.53 which came into their hands representing in part the value of certain improvements on a tract of land acquired by the federal government by condemnation and located at Watertown, ITalawa, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii. A portion of the land was at the time of condemnation under lease in small areas to various tenants who had erected thereon the improvements…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Denegre v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Haas v. Wishmier's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. In Re the Claim of Mott-SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Packard v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Smithies v. ConklingHawaii Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate Bernice P. BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re the Estate of AllenHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Matter of Estate of DwightHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Akana v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API