Legal Opinion

Smithies v. Conkling

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Submission upon Agreed Statement oe Eacts.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

It appears from the agreed statement of facts in. this case that during the period between June 14, .1900, and January 26, 1901, certain persons, firms and corporations (named in *601the statement') paid- to the treasurer of the Territory sums aggregating the total of $18,938.78 as and for annual merchandise license fees under and pursuant to the provisions of sections 1 to 7 and sections 75 to 79 of Act 64 of the Session Laws of 1896 (sections 690-696 and 764-768 of the Penal Laws, 1897) as amended by section 72 of the Organic Act; that pursuant to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Price v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. President of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Beard v. RowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. PrevoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. WillburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bishop v. PittmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API