Legal Opinion

Birch v. County of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1922No. Civ. No. 3962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover the sum of $11,173.86, which amount they alleged had been paid to the tax collector of the county of Orange under protest. Incidental to that recovery the court was asked to set aside an assessment valuation entered by the county assessor against the plaintiffs’ property for the year 1918 as to all amounts in excess of $150,000. A judgment of nonsuit was granted, from which plaintiffs, have appealed.

Plaintiffs, as copartners, owned 20.16 acres of land in the county of Orange, upon which there were, during the year 1917-1918, nine or ten wells…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. State Board of EqualizationU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Eastern-Columbia, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API