Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Ervin & Associates, Inc. v. Hamilton Securities Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 25, 2005No. Nos. CIV.A.96-CV-1258 LFO, CIV.A.99-CV-1698-LFOPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPERSEDING MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
The instant qui tam action was filed on June 6, 1996, on behalf of the United States by plaintiffs John Ervin and Ervin Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Ervin”) against several entities, including Hamilton Securities Group, Inc. (“Hamilton”). Over the course of four days of trial i; a October 2003, Ervin submitted testimou .y and documentary evidence against Ham;' il-ton and rested. Thereupon, Hamilb on. moved for Judgment on Partial Findin .gs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. A Ja nuary 7, 2004 Order granted the r notion a vith…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hockett v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Head v. Kane Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Williams v. Renal Care Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.