Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for writ of mandamus to the resident ex-secretary of a foreign corporation. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Application for writ of mandamus. Mandamus. Petition shows the corporation petitioner was incorporated under the laws of the territory of Arizona, with its principal place of business at Phoenix, Arizona, and a provision in its articles of incorporation that it should have a branch office in the city of Los Angeles, California; and that the purpose of its incorporation was to buy, lease, hold and operate oil lands and oil wells and deal in the products thereof throughout the United States. That all its property is situated in the state of California, and it is, and has been for several years,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Sherman v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.