Legal Opinion
In re Albrecht
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 1, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 75-503PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Senior Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 — 8 of appellants’ application serial No. 833,718, filed June 16, 1969, for “Bis-Basic Esters and Amides of Carbazole.” 1 We reverse.
The compounds of appellants’ invention, the specification states, “can be administered to animals, such as warmblooded animals and particularly mammals, for their prophylactic or therapeu*1391tic antiviral effects by conventional modes of administration, either alone, but preferably with pharmaceutical carriers.”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of HenzeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In re LintnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., Federal Pharmacal, Inc., Seymour N. Blackman, Steven Blackman, John Blackman v. Richard D. Wood, C. Harvey Bradley, Jr., Earl B. Herr, Jr., Cornelius W. Pettinga, Eugene L. Step and Arthur R. Whale, Additional on the CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.