In re Lintner

Lane, Judge.

This appeal was taken from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining the rejection of claims 1-5, all the claims in appellant’s application entitled “Laundry Compositions.”1 The rejection was based on 35 USC 103, the examiner concluding that the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. The *1005board agreed, and our review of the record and briefs reveals no error in the board’s decision. We accordingly affirm.

The Invention

The claims are drawn to a laundry composition for use in a washing machine which is a mixture of an organic cationic…