Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Robbins

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 13, 1997No. 96-0570PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

Robin Arnold appeals a judgment declaring the boundary line between her property and that of her neighbors, John and Linda Robbins, to be one marked by a common grantor, rather than the lot line established by the recorded plat map. Because we conclude that the facts found by the trial court are insufficient to satisfy the common grantor exception to the doctrine of acquiescence, which requires that the lots be purchased pursuant to a common reference line, we reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

The parties in this case own Lots 4 and 5…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Racine v. J. I. Case Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Janesville Community Day Care Center, Inc. v. SpodenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Buza v. WojtalewiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Beasley v. KonczalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STEUCK LIVING TRUST v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  2. James v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. James v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. STEUCK LIVING TRUST v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API