City of Racine v. J. I. Case Plow Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Racine County. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion. The circuit court found that the defendants had not encroached upon the street as designated on the plat. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
The complaint is for an injunction to restrain the defendant company from encroaching upon "Water street, in Harbor addition to the village (now city) of JRaeim, by constructing buildings upon block fifteen projecting into said street, and for the removal and abatement of any such projections already constructed within such street, and for the establishment of said street according to the survey and plat of said addition, and as marked thereon. The answer denies the encroachment, and raises the only question in the case, and that is, What is the true location of Water street according to .the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Payne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- McIver Lessee v. Walker and AnotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Fleischfresser v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Marsh v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Nys v. BiemeretWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gilman v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Wollman v. RuehleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Racine v. EmersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Madison v. MayersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Lewis v. PrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.