Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Riddell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 2008No. 08-217Published

1Per curiam

Appellants Michael and Lindsey Spurlock, by and through their attorney, Timothy W. Murdoch, bring this motion for reconsideration. On February 20, 2008, Appellants filed a motion for rule on clerk requesting that we direct our supreme court clerk to accept their record on appeal for filing. As an alternative, they requested we remand their appeal to the circuit court for entry of an order in compliance with Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 5(b)(1). On March 13, 2008, we denied this motion because of Appellants’ failure to strictly comply with Rule 5(b)(1). See Spurlock v. Riddell, 373 Ark. 38, 280 S.W.3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Byrer v. ColvardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Spurlock v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API