Legal Opinion

In Re Kissi

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 12, 2011No. 09-5277, 09-7067PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This court recently held that the filing fee provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), applies to a prisoner who files a petition for writ of mandamus in connection with an underlying civil case. In re Grant, 635 F.3d 1227, 1232 (D.C.Cir.2011). The question now before the court is whether the PLRA’s three-strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), likewise applies to a mandamus petition in an underlying civil case. For the following reasons, we hold that it does.

I

David Kissi was incarcerated when he petitioned this court for writs of mandamus to prevent the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Melvin Leroy TylerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Peter C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Ibrahim v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jeremy Pinson v. Charles SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. Kissi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. McFadden v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Bailey v. RoodDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  5. Burns v. SchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API