Martin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
We have consolidated for consideration and decision five cases presenting four questions of interpretation under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L. 104-134, Title VIII, 110 Stat. 1321, and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, both enacted this past April.
1. The first question (presented by No. 96-8027) is whether a petition for mandamus is within the scope of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which imposes new requirements on prison inmates desiring to sue in federal court. We do not think that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edwardo Reyes v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In Re Melvin Leroy TylerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- James R. Kincade v. Emmit L. Sparkman, Warden Commonwealth of Kentucky, Anthony L. Hereford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Adonai El-Shaddai v. Jeffrey Wang, MdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.