Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1936No. Crim. 1528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Appellant was charged with and found guilty of the crime defined by section 288 of the Penal Code, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction, he prosecutes this appeal.

He first contends the evidence does not support the verdict. The information alleges that appellant committed certain lewd and lascivious acts upon prosecutrix, a nine-year-old girl, with the intent then and there of arousing, appealing to and gratifying the lust and passions and sexual desires of the child and the defendant.

Appellant now claims that, having charged in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CiullaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. People v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. People v. McCurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. CrumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API