Legal Opinion

People v. Crume

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1976No. Crim. 8296PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Defendant appeals after jury conviction of violation of Penal Code sections 288 (two counts) 1 and 288a (one count). 2 In respect to the latter crime, it was also charged and found by the jury that defendant’s victim was under the age of 14 and he, the defendant, was more than 10 years her senior. The victims of the offenses, Tanya and Tamara Grume, are defendant’s adoptive daughters. They were 13 and 12 years old respectively in February 1974.

Tanya testified to a single incident of sexual molestation occurring during the month of February 1974 in which her father…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DelettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. MotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. AlvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API