Legal Opinion
Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 2000No. 1998-2572PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 121.] HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF DAYTON AND THE MIAMI VALLEY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF BEAVERCREEK, APPELLANT. [Cite as Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek,
2000-Ohio-115.] Municipal corporations—Streets and highways—Impact fee adopted by ordinance that partially funds new roadway projects is constitutional, when. An exaction fee adopted by ordinance that partially funds new roadway projects is constitutional if it bears a reasonable relationship between the city’s interest in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. HawkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheetz v. El Dorado CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson Creek Partners, L.P. v. Cnty. of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Anderson Creek Partners, L.P. v. Cnty.of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- PF Dev. Grp., LLC v. Cnty. of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.