Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Copeland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 2002No. 2-01-112-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The issue on appeal is whether a plaintiff may recover negligently inflicted mental anguish damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident in which shé was involved but not physically injured. Plaintiff Elizabeth Fitzpatrick appeals from summary judgments that she take nothing from David Weldon Copeland, David Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. and Southwest International Trucks, Inc., (collectively “Appellees”). We affirm.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The pertinent facts established by the summary judgment evidence are undisputed. David Weldon…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Robinson v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. SchubertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. El Paso Cnty. Water Improvement Dist. 1 v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. B.Y.C.C. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API