Fitzpatrick v. Copeland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANNE GARDNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The issue on appeal is whether a plaintiff may recover negligently inflicted mental anguish damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident in which shé was involved but not physically injured. Plaintiff Elizabeth Fitzpatrick appeals from summary judgments that she take nothing from David Weldon Copeland, David Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. and Southwest International Trucks, Inc., (collectively “Appellees”). We affirm.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The pertinent facts established by the summary judgment evidence are undisputed. David Weldon…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Robinson v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. SchubertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- El Paso Cnty. Water Improvement Dist. 1 v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- B.Y.C.C. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.