Legal Opinion
Reibel v. City of Birmingham
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1970PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, P. J.
The plaintiff complains that the single-family residence zoning of his property is unreasonable. He appeals a judgment denying his claim.
The plaintiff owns a lot 2 in the City of Birmingham, Michigan. The lot is in a block bounded by Maple (15-Mile) Road on the north, Forest Avenue on the south and Adams Road on the east. The lot is located at the southeast corner of the block, i.e., at Forest and Adams.
The northerly and southerly dimension of the block is 800 feet, the westerly and easterly dimension is 400 feet.
The northerly two-thirds of the block is improved with office and other…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Muskegon Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Robin Corp., Aplnt. v. Bd. of Spvrs., LptCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Business Ventures, Inc. v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Armstrong v. Ross TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Drummer Development Corp. v. Township of AvonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.