Legal Opinion

Meyersdale Fuel Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1930No. J-261PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover $76,-551.06 alleged to represent the balance of an overpayment of income and profits tax due it for 1920 resulting from the filing of a consolidated return for that year for itself and three other corporations known as the Franklin Gas Coal Company, the Smokeless Quemahoning Coal Company, and the Randolph Coal Company. The consolidated return was filed in plaintiff’s name, and the total tax shown thereon upon the consolidated net income of all of the corporations amounting to $109,639.03 was paid in four installments to the collector of…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arthur C. Ewing A/K/A A. Clifford Ewing Maxine H. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. MacAtee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Leggett v. Southeastern People's College, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Muir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API