Legal Opinion
Cumberpatch v. Nolan
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1954No. Civ. 15909PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from judgment in their favor in the sum of $63.62.
Questions Presented
1. Effect of order setting aside default judgment against defendant Ray E. Nolan without setting aside his default.
2. Effect of the judgment against Emily M. Nolan.
Record
Defendant Ray was served with summons November 16, 1951. On November 28th he obtained an order extending to December 10th his time to appear. December 27th his default was taken and judgment entered against him for, among other matters, damagés in the sum of $1,500. January 4, 1952, he filed notice of motion stating he would move “to vacate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard Greer Custom Originals v. CaprittiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- McCarthy v. Gaston Ridge Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Himes v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- City of Pacific Grove v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Collins v. Marvel Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Kass v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Dale v. ITT Life Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.