Kass v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, J. *
Plaintiff Kass appeals from an order vacating a default judgment in a class action and vacating the default of defendant Neil Young insofar as it relates to a class action, but allowing the default to remain against appellant Young to the extent that defendant as an individual is concerned (judgment to be subject to proof of damages as to plaintiff’s individual rights). Appellant Young cross-appeals from the order allowing the limited default to remain. Both sides agree that the case appears to be one of first impression as to the effect of default in an alleged class…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fireside Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Don v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. DemarioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Petty v. Manpower, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Atari, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.