Legal Opinion

Taber Mill v. Southern Brighton Mills

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1934No. 23884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. This is the third appearance of this case in this court. The defendant filed a demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration in attachment and the trial court overruled the demurrer. On exceptions to that judgment this court held that the demurrer was good in so far as it questioned the right of recovery by the plaintiff be*391cause of the alleged want of tensile strength in the yarn, there being nothing in the contract sued on that fixed any tensile strength. This court further held that the declaration in attachment was good in so far as it sought to recover for beams and freight. The judgment of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fincher v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Matthews & Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Taber Mill v. Southern Brighton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. FRANK GRAHAM COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Armour Company v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Warren v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Pollard v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. General Forms, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API