Legal Opinion

Armour Company v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1940No. 28406PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. In charging the jury it is not reversible error for the court to state correctly the contentions as made by the allegations of the parties, or give them by a narrative reading of the allegations of the petition, even though some of the contentions in either instance be unsupported by the evidence. Mayor &c. of Americus v. Gammage, 15 Ga. App. 805 (84 S. E. 144); Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Carroll, 143 Ga. 93 (2) (84 S. E. 434); Matthews v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway, 17 Ga. App. 664 (87 S. E. 1097); W. & A. R. Co. v. Lochridge, 39 Ga. App. 246, 257 (146 S. E. 776); Southern Railway…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Hunt v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Matthews & Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Americus Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. LochridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Robertson v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Limbert v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Barbre v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Jones v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API