Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. Parrish
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 25, 1930No. 19810PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “It is the right and duty of the presiding judge to state to the jury the several contentions between the parties, the only restriction being that he shall state them fairly to each side.” City & Suburban Ry. v. Finley, 76 Ga. 311 (3); May v. Srochi, 23 Ga. App. 33 (3), 35 (97 S. E. 277). In the instant ease it can not be said that the action of the trial judge in reading to the jury the entire declaration of the plaintiff, consisting of several pages of typewritten matter, and then *815reading- to the jury the entire answer of the defendant,' which was very short, consisting of four…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- City Council of Augusta v. DrawdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Moore v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Long v. SerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.