Legal Opinion

Petrie v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1996No. LUBA 95-094; CA A90367PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s memorandum decision, affirming land use decisions of the City of Lake Oswego from which petitioner appealed. We affirm.

LUBA’s authority to decide appeals through memorandum decisions was established by the legislature through Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 595, section 5, which is codified as ORS 197.835(16) and provides:

"[LUBA] may decide cases before it by means of memorandum decisions and shall prepare full opinions only in such cases as it deems proper.”

This is the first occasion in which our review of a memorandum decision has been sought.

Petitioner makes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HerriedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Angel v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jebousek v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Testa v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API