Legal Opinion

State v. Herried

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

The three defendants were convicted of possession of marihuana, sentenced to 90 days in jail, and on appeal make three assignments of error. Rule 19 of the Supreme Court and of this court is a rule of long standing. It reads in pertinent part:

“Each assignment of error shall be clearly and succinctly stated under separate and appropriate headings. The assignments of error must be specific and must set out haec verba the pertinent portions of the record. Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching the record for the proceedings complained of will not…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Petrie v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Charlemagne v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API