Angel v. City of Portland

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Portland’s denial of his application to rezone his property from residential to a commercial designation. Respondents move to strike petitioner’s brief, because it does not comply with ORAP 5.45. Respondents explain, in part:

“Petitioner’s brief purportedly raises two assignments of error to this Court. The first assignment of error complains of LUBA’s failure to ‘require the City Council to apply the proper standards * * * and to make appropriate findings * * *.’ The text of the assignment of error and the discussion at Petitioner’s…