Jebousek v. City of Newport
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner Jebousek seeks review of LUBA’s memorandum opinion, OHS 197.835(16), which affirmed without discussion the city of Newport’s decision allowing a lot line adjustment that facilitates planned residential development on the affected property. Petitioner, who lives across the street from the property, makes a number of arguments, one of which requires a remand to LUBA. We write to address only that argument.
Petitioner contends that the slope of the affected property “drops off drastically,” and that development on it would pose a landslide risk. She therefore argues that, as part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Petrie v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Testa v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Potter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Jebousek v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Jebousek v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999