Legal Opinion
Trgo v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 20, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00646PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On July 13,1998, Defendant Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment in this diversity action. [Doc. 105]. In deciding this motion, the Court must determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding seven claims involving breach of express and implied warranty, fraud, and misrepresentation.
Because the Court finds no genuine issue of material fact regarding plaintiffs’ breach of express warranty claim under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), the Court grants Defendant Chrysler’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Hdm Flugservice Gmbh v. Parker Hannifin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Malkamaki v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Bowes v. PACCAR IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020