Legal Opinion
Bowes v. PACCAR Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 11, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01794Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 JAMES BOWES et al., CASE NO. C19-1794-JCC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 PACCAR, INC. et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal 16 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 25). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ 17 briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS 18 in part and DENIES in part the motion for the reasons explained herein. 19 I.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.