Reed Schmidt & Associates, Inc. v. Carafiol Furniture Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
In this action to recover a reasonable real estate commission the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $5100.00. Defendant filed its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial under Civil Rule 72.02, V.A.M.R. In its motion for judgment the defendant contended, among other grounds, that the plaintiff had failed to plead and prove that it was a licensed real estate broker, as required by the laws of the State of Missouri. See Section 339.160, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Thereupon plaintiff filed the affidavit of Reed A. Schmidt, its president and principal officer, in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bailey v. Interstate Airmotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Oliver L. Taetz, Inc. v. GroffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Lance v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Yoos v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- General Aggregate Corp. v. LaBrayereMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. Circulus, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mills Realty, Inc. v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.