Legal Opinion
Target Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 17, 2009No. Consol. 06-00383PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge.
Before the court are the Final Results Pursuant to Court Remand (Nov. 10, 2008) (“Remand Determination”) filed by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to Target Corp. v. United States, 32 CIT -, 578 F.Supp.2d 1369 (2008) (“Target”), a consolidated action in which Plaintiffs, Target Corporation (“Target”), Qingdao Kingking Applied Chemistry Co., Ltd., et al. (“Qingdao”), and Specialty Merchandise Corporation (“SMC”), have challenged Commerce’s final affirmative circumvention determination that petroleum wax candles with 50 percent or more palm or other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Novosteel SA v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Hoogovens Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Target Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Deseado International, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Feili Group (Fujian) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019