Legal Opinion
Deseado International, Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 2010No. 2009-1355PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”)’s 1986 antidumping duty order covering petroleum wax candles from the People’s Republic of China (“People’s Republic”). The appeal challenges the Court of International Trade’s affirmance of Commerce’s refusal to consider in an administrative proceeding the appellant’s contention that the antidumping duty order does not cover the candles it exported to the United States, on the ground that it had not participated in a prior Commerce administrative proceeding in which Commerce had decided that question. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. The United States, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Nichimen America, Inc., Formerly Known as Nichimen Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Target Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Royal United Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Halvonik v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- American Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.