Legal Opinion
Farkas v. Ellis
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1992No. 91 Civ. 182 (WCC)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
In an Opinion and Order dated January 10, 1992, 780 F.Supp. 1013, this Court denied pro se plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., and dismissed the ac tion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Familiarity with that opinion is presumed. This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Rules 52(b) and 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., “for Amendment of Findings of Fact and Judgement.” For the reasons outlined below, plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This action is brought…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- All Hawaii Tours, Corp. v. Polynesian Cultural CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Travelers Insurance v. Buffalo Reinsurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Savage & Associates, P.C. v. Mandl (In Re Teligent, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Woodard v. HardenfelderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc. (In Re Houbigant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Jones v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.