Legal Opinion

In Re Freel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1982No. 55035PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldenhersh

On May 9, 1980, the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (Commission) filed a one-count complaint against respondent, James D. Freel, who was admitted to the practice of law on November 19, 1954. A panel of the Hearing Board found that the Administrator had proved by clear and convincing evidence that respondent had failed to properly account for his client’s funds, had failed promptly, upon request, to pay and deliver the client’s funds, and had commingled the client’s funds with his own. The panel recommended that respondent’s license to practice law be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re BloomIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re LingleIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re UshijimaIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re EnstromIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re McLennonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API