Legal Opinion
Burke v. Bloom
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1960No. Civ. No. 24580PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff sued Lee, Miller and defendants Bloom for personal injuries arising out of a rear-end collision. The trial court found Lee was negligent in the operation of a *1581940 Studebaker and granted a default judgment for $16,827.20, found Miller to be the owner of the Studebaker and entered default judgment for $5,000, and after a full trial entered judgment against plaintiff and in favor of defendants Bloom upon a finding they were not negligent, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.
Appellant’s contentions that the lower court’s finding defendants Bloom “were not negligent in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monell v. College of Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Haynes v. GwynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Landis v. BlomquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.